Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
|
summa15 [2016/02/04 00:27] clodoveu |
summa15 [2017/05/14 18:26] (current) clodoveu |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| * [[etc|Back to Offline Hours]] | * [[etc|Back to Offline Hours]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | * [[calc|Back to Mechanical Calculators]] | ||
| I purchased this machine in January 2016 at an online auction site. Even though the vendor warned in his ad that the machine was not working at all, its exterior appearance was good, the case was intact and all the keys were present. | I purchased this machine in January 2016 at an online auction site. Even though the vendor warned in his ad that the machine was not working at all, its exterior appearance was good, the case was intact and all the keys were present. | ||
| - | Upon arrival, the machine actually did not work at all. All number keys were firmly stuck, the main lever was completely loose and the joystick was locked in the total (*) position. The ribbon was completely dry, moldy and immobile. The only working part was the paper advance mechanism. | + | Upon arrival, all number keys were firmly stuck, the main lever was completely loose and the joystick was locked in the total (*) position. The ribbon was completely dry, moldy and immobile. The only working part was the manual paper advance mechanism. |
| I bought this machine in hopes it would give me some clues to repair an Olivetti Summa Prima 20, manufactured about 16 years later. However, the machine is very different internally, although the working principles are the same and the same engineer designed both. I find both the Olivetti Summa 15 and the Summa Prima 20 to be more dependent on good lubrication and maintenance than the FACITs. Olivetti resorts many times to mechanisms that are more fail-prone, if lubrication isn't very good. There are also more clips, slots, rivets, and less regular standardized screws. Maybe FACIT's tolerances are lower, or the machining is superior, but I found Olivettis much more dependent on fine tuning than the FACITs. | I bought this machine in hopes it would give me some clues to repair an Olivetti Summa Prima 20, manufactured about 16 years later. However, the machine is very different internally, although the working principles are the same and the same engineer designed both. I find both the Olivetti Summa 15 and the Summa Prima 20 to be more dependent on good lubrication and maintenance than the FACITs. Olivetti resorts many times to mechanisms that are more fail-prone, if lubrication isn't very good. There are also more clips, slots, rivets, and less regular standardized screws. Maybe FACIT's tolerances are lower, or the machining is superior, but I found Olivettis much more dependent on fine tuning than the FACITs. | ||
| Line 11: | Line 13: | ||
| Anyway, the Summa 15 was stuck exclusively due to old lubrication. It seemed the machine was lubricated with molasses or glue. Many parts did not move, some only in slow motion. Using lots of patience and kerosene, I managed to get the main mechanisms unstuck, only to be able to identify functions and prepare for disassembly. It turned out that the Summa 15 has a rather modular design, with sections such as the keyboard and the paper handling mechanisms attached by just a few screws and springs. The keyboard carriage, however, had to be forcibly unstuck -- after cleaning the old grease/glue, it worked smoothly. | Anyway, the Summa 15 was stuck exclusively due to old lubrication. It seemed the machine was lubricated with molasses or glue. Many parts did not move, some only in slow motion. Using lots of patience and kerosene, I managed to get the main mechanisms unstuck, only to be able to identify functions and prepare for disassembly. It turned out that the Summa 15 has a rather modular design, with sections such as the keyboard and the paper handling mechanisms attached by just a few screws and springs. The keyboard carriage, however, had to be forcibly unstuck -- after cleaning the old grease/glue, it worked smoothly. | ||
| - | Later on I disassembled the main lever locks, the ribbon carriages and some assorted locks and levers. Many small parts went through the ultrasonic washer. The counting gears and the printer were OK, except for locks and articulations that were stuck at first, but the kerosene wash and lubrication were enough to get them working properly. Thus, the disassembly of this machine was not total. | + | Later on I disassembled the main lever locks, the ribbon carriages and some assorted locks and levers. Many small parts went through the ultrasonic washer. The counting gears and the printer were OK, except for locks and articulations that were stuck at first, but the kerosene wash and lubrication were enough to get them working properly. Thus, the disassembly of this machine was not total, but I intend to do it in the future. Some small articulations have a decisive role in the result of the calculations, including mechanisms to avoid printing left zeroes, negative balance adjustments, and the hammers that press the moving types in the printer. |
| + | |||
| + | As opposed to the FACITs, this and other Olivetti machines include mechanisms to perform tens complement automatically and print correct negative sums. In the FACITs, the operator is required to do a back transfer and a subtraction to get the negative result. | ||
| There's no reference as to the year of manufacture, but the Summa 15 was introduced in 1949, and was popular throughout the 1950s. Since the more modern Summa Prima 20 was manufactured in Argentina from the early 1960s, I think it's safe to assume that this machine dates back to the early 1950s. The Summa 15 was also manufactured in Brazil for a period, but I have no precise information on that so far. This unit was made in Italy, and remained in operation in Brazil until 1984 -- at least, that is the date marked on an inspection stamp posted inside the ribbon cover. | There's no reference as to the year of manufacture, but the Summa 15 was introduced in 1949, and was popular throughout the 1950s. Since the more modern Summa Prima 20 was manufactured in Argentina from the early 1960s, I think it's safe to assume that this machine dates back to the early 1950s. The Summa 15 was also manufactured in Brazil for a period, but I have no precise information on that so far. This unit was made in Italy, and remained in operation in Brazil until 1984 -- at least, that is the date marked on an inspection stamp posted inside the ribbon cover. | ||
| Line 76: | Line 80: | ||
| [[http://www.curtamania.com/curta/database/brand/Olivetti/Olivetti%20Summa%2015/more/Olivetti%20Summa%2015%20Instrucciones%20para%20el%20Uso%20(Spanish).pdf | Operations manual (in Spanish)]] | [[http://www.curtamania.com/curta/database/brand/Olivetti/Olivetti%20Summa%2015/more/Olivetti%20Summa%2015%20Instrucciones%20para%20el%20Uso%20(Spanish).pdf | Operations manual (in Spanish)]] | ||
| - | [[http://www.aconit.org/histoire/calcul_mecanique/documents/Olivetti_Summa_Quanta_20.pdf | An explanation of the design of the Summa Quanta 20, an electrical machine similar to the Summa Prima 20, a successor to the Summa 15. The calculating principle is the same]] | + | [[http://www.dcc.ufmg.br/~clodoveu/files/Images/Summa15/Summa-15-manual-italian.pdf | Operations manual (in Italian)]] |
| [[http://www.johnwolff.id.au/calculators/Olivetti/Olivetti.htm | John Wolfe's Web Museum, description of the entire Olivetti line along time]] | [[http://www.johnwolff.id.au/calculators/Olivetti/Olivetti.htm | John Wolfe's Web Museum, description of the entire Olivetti line along time]] | ||
