http://paul.merton.ox.ac.uk/science/maths-proofs.html ------------------ The following is a list of some common proof techniques that are often extremely useful. 1.Proof by example: The author gives only the case n = 2 and suggests that it contains most of the ideas of the general proof. 2.Proof by intimidation: 'Trivial.' 3.Proof by vigorous handwaving: Works well in a classroom or seminar setting. 4.Proof by cumbersome notation: Best done with access to at least four alphabets and special symbols. 5.Proof by exhaustion: An issue or two of a journal devoted to your proof is useful. 6.Proof by omission: 'The reader may easily supply the details.' 'The other 253 cases are analogous.' '...' 7.Proof by obfuscation: A long plotless sequence of true and/or meaningless syntactically related statements. 8.Proof by wishful citation: The author cites the negation, converse, or generalization of a theorem from literature to support his claims. 9.Proof by funding: How could three different government agencies be wrong? 10.Proof by eminent authority: 'I saw Karp in the elevator and he said it was probably NP-complete.' 11.Proof by personal communication: 'Eight-dimensional colored cycle stripping is NP-complete [Karp, personal communication].' 12.Proof by reduction to the wrong problem: ' To see that infinite-dimensional colored cycle stripping is decidable, we reduce it to the halting problem.' 13.Proof by reference to inaccessible literature: The author cites a simple corollary of a theorem to be found in a privately circulated memoir of the Slovenian Philological Society, 1883. 14.Proof by importance: A large body of useful consequences all follow from the proposition in question. 15.Proof by accumulated evidence: Long and diligent search has not revealed a counterexample. 16.Proof by cosmology: The negation of the proposition is unimaginable or meaningless. Popular for proofs of the existence of God. 17.Proof by mutual reference: In reference A, Theorem 5 is said to follow from Theorem 3 in reference B, which is shown from Corollary 6.2 in reference C, which is an easy consequence of Theorem 5 in reference A. 18.Proof by metaproof: A method is given to construct the desired proof. The correctness of the method is proved by any of these techniques. 19.Proof by picture: A more convincing form of proof by example. Combines well with proof by omission. 20.Proof by vehement assertion: It is useful to have some kind of authority in relation to the audience. 21.Proof by ghost reference: Nothing even remotely resembling the cited theorem appears in the reference given. 22.Proof by forward reference: Reference is usually to a forthcoming paper of the author, which is often not as forthcoming as at first. 23.Proof by semantic shift: Some standard but inconvenient definitions are changed for the statement of the result. 24.Proof by appeal to intuition: Cloud-shaped drawings frequently help here. (based on an unoriginal email forwarded by Richard Green, Mar 1997)